++
AI & Machine Learning

AI Agent Development

An AI agent is only useful when it can act: call your APIs, update your systems, and know when to stop. Masarrati builds production agents and copilots around your actual tool surface — function calling with validated schemas, retrieval over your own knowledge, policy-bounded autonomy, and evaluation harnesses that measure task success rather than plausible-sounding output. We build support agents, operations copilots, onboarding agents and internal assistants that ship with guardrails and an audit trail from day one.

++

What is AI Agent Development?

AI agent development is building autonomous software that uses tools, follows policies and completes tasks in real systems — support agents, operations copilots and internal assistants. Masarrati builds production agents with validated function calling, retrieval grounding, policy-bounded autonomy and task-level evaluation, embedded in your product and handed over with full audit trails.

Engineering Targets

Figures below are the benchmarks we design and test against on this type of build. They are targets, not a warranty — what your platform actually achieves depends on your data, scale and integration surface, and we agree the numbers that matter with you before work starts.

Scored
Task Evaluation Suite
Policy
Enforced In Code
Audited
Every Action Logged
2 wks
To First Prototype

Why This Matters

The difference between a chatbot and an agent is consequence: an agent changes state in real systems. That makes tool design, permissioning and evaluation the actual engineering work — the model is the easy part. Teams that skip this ship demos; teams that do it ship software their operations can rely on.

++
FEATURES

What You Get

Capabilities

Tool Interface Design

Function schemas engineered for reliability — idempotent operations, typed parameters, explicit error contracts — because agents are only as dependable as the tools they call.

Grounded Reasoning

Retrieval over your documents and systems of record before the agent acts, so answers and actions trace to your data rather than model priors.

Bounded Autonomy

Explicit policies for what the agent may do alone, what needs approval, and what it must never touch — enforced in code, not in the prompt.

Evaluation Harness

A scored task suite run on every change, measuring completion, accuracy and safety rather than demo impressions.

Product Embedding

Agents surfaced inside your product as copilots — with UI states for thinking, acting and asking — rather than bolted on as a chat window.

Audit & Replay

Every action recorded with inputs, reasoning and outcome, replayable for debugging and defensible in a compliance review.

++
++
PROCESS

Our Approach

How We Deliver

01

Task Definition

Pick one workflow, define success measurably, and map every tool the agent needs

02

Tool Hardening

Build validated, idempotent tool interfaces before any autonomous behaviour

03

Grounded Prototype

Working agent on real data, scored against the evaluation suite

04

Ship & Monitor

Staged rollout with action audit, quality tracking and tuned autonomy levels

++

Real-World Applications

Use Cases

Customer support

agent resolving tier-1 tickets end to end with refund limits and escalation rules

Sales operations

copilot drafting quotes from CRM data with pricing-policy enforcement

HR and onboarding

agent provisioning accounts and walking new joiners through setup

Finance

invoice-processing agent matching, coding and routing exceptions to a human

Internal knowledge

grounded assistant answering from your documentation with citations

Technology Stack

PythonPythonLangChainLangChainOAOpenAIHugging FaceHugging FacePostgreSQLPostgreSQLDockerDockerAWSAWS

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a chatbot and an AI agent?

A chatbot answers; an agent acts. Agents call tools, change records in real systems and complete tasks end to end, which is why the engineering centres on tool design, permissions and evaluation rather than conversation quality. That difference in consequence is what makes production discipline non-negotiable.

How do you keep an agent from doing something it should not?

Policies enforced in code, not in the prompt: action allow-lists, spend and scope limits, approval gates for irreversible operations, and entitlement checks on every tool call. The prompt shapes behaviour; the enforcement layer guarantees it.

Can the agent work inside our existing product and systems?

Yes — that is the normal case. We build against your actual APIs and databases, embed the agent in your product as a copilot where that fits, and design the tool layer around your permission model, so the agent can only ever do what the signed-in user could do.

How do you measure whether the agent actually works?

With a scored task suite run on every change: completion rate, accuracy against known-good outcomes, and safety checks for actions it should have refused. Demos persuade; evaluation numbers decide what ships.

++++
++

Ready to get started?

Let's Build Together

++