Healthcare

HIPAA in the US, GDPR in Europe, and regional health data regulations. Requirements include data encryption, access controls, audit trails, breach notification procedures, and business associate agreements with all vendors.

AI powers medical imaging diagnosis, drug discovery, clinical decision support, patient risk prediction, administrative automation, and personalized treatment plans. Masarrati builds these systems with clinical validation workflows and audit trails, and works to the regulatory pathway your device or software classification requires.

The ability of different health systems to exchange and use patient data seamlessly. Standards like HL7 FHIR enable this. Masarrati builds interoperable systems that connect hospitals, clinics, labs, and pharmacies.

An MVP with video, scheduling, and basic records takes 10-14 weeks. A full platform with EHR integration, prescriptions, and billing typically takes 5-8 months. Timelines depend on how many source systems have to be integrated and how much of the clinical workflow is in scope.

End-to-end encryption, zero-trust architecture, role-based access, multi-factor authentication, regular penetration testing, SOC 2 compliance, and incident response plans. Masarrati builds security into every layer.

In most cases, yes. Where the vendor exposes FHIR or HL7 interfaces we build against those directly. Where it does not, we work through supported export files, database views or an interface engine sitting between the systems, and agree the arrangement with the vendor and your governance team first. The integration layer is documented and tested against recorded messages, so behaviour is predictable before it touches live records.

You do. Clinical data stays in your infrastructure or a cloud tenancy registered to your organisation, and we work under a data processing agreement for the duration of the build only. Source code sits in your repositories from the first commit. At handover you receive architecture documentation, runbooks, test suites and the compliance evidence pack, so your team or another supplier can take the system forward.

It depends on what the software claims to do. Administrative, scheduling and record-keeping tools generally sit outside device regulation, while software that diagnoses, screens or drives treatment decisions can fall within it under EU MDR or FDA classification. Where that applies, IEC 62304 governs the development lifecycle and the documentation burden rises considerably. We assess the intended purpose with your regulatory adviser before scoping, because the answer changes the engineering process.

By separating the deployment rather than the codebase. Each region runs its own database and storage in the jurisdiction the data was collected in, with a shared application build deployed per region and configuration controlling retention, consent wording and lawful basis. Cross-border reporting uses aggregated or pseudonymised extracts rather than raw records. Where a regulator requires local hosting, the platform is deployed into a cloud region or on-premise environment inside that country.